My understanding is that LDL is necessary in every cell in the body, and that higher healthy LDL correlates favorably / positively with lower all cause mortality in people over 60. My understanding is that healthy LDL is essential and that damaged LDL may correlate with disease. My understanding is that LDL is damaged in humans primarily through two mechanisms: 1. exposure to high sugar / carbs, especially for prolonged periods, and 2. LDL exposure to high oxidation, as occurs with high Omega-6 levels (high O-6 to O-3 ratios) found in most or all seed oil fats. As I understand it.
I watch oodles of research reviews and lectures in this field, without ever really articulating any of it, but as far as my ear goes, that aligns with what I’ve seen.
I'd say Refined /Processed carbs ,more than high amounts of complex carbs .Ldl is also oxidised by smoking (probably vaping ,too), over-exercising , and micro-plastics , amongst other things .
@@kenadams5504 Humans can manufacture all the glucose / carbs / sugar the body needs, there is ZERO need for dietary carbs, high amounts of complex carbs DISPLACE essential nutrients PROTEIN and ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS. Carbs (broadly) on a scale of 10 produce an insulin respones of 9.5, protein (broadly) is 4-4.5, fats is .5 to 1. Humanity largely has an epidemic of diseases of civilization (diabetes, heart disease, obesity, etc.) that result from hyperinsulinemia secondary to too much carbs too much of the time. Sarcopenia can be treated with high protein and resistance training. Seizure disorder and other neurodegenerative diseases can be treated with high fat / low carb diets. Complex carbs can cause weight gain / obesity / diabetes / hypertension / heart disease. Complex carbs are almost certainly superior to simple carbs in essentially the same way, but to a different degree, that they are superior to heroin and methamphetamine. My approach is Just Say No. Of course you can have all you want. Cheers. :)
This was really interesting. Correlation v causation. When I hear marathon running and cardio cause heart disease, I can't help but think that almost all of those people were/are high carb eaters, like your hubby. So is it the carbs, or the exercise? Do people who are fat adapted for their cardio have the same risk? Fascinating.
Dr. Al Sears published an excellent book in 2010 explaining the problems of doing sustained cardio workouts (e.g. endurance running). The book is entitled "P.A.C.E. The 12-Minute Fitness Revolution." His idea involves doing short bursts of exertion, a complete departure from long cardio activity. I agree with his approach. In addition, his ideas about diet and insulin resistance were very much "on target" and many of the experts I follow today (e.g. Dr. Ben Bikman, Dr. Ken Berry, Dr. Jason Fung, etc.) are explaining diet and metabolism the same way Dr. Sears wrote about this in 2010. By the way, great talk, Susan!
N=2 I love it. Most people don’t make diet decisions on their own. A large number of people choose their diet with the influence of their spouse. Thank you for sharing.
I'm a LMHR and we usually eat seperate meals. On holiday I will eat mostly meat while my wife is more plant-based. When we eat in restaurants we will often swap some of the meat and veg in dishes that satisfies both of us.
@@randyblanton5580 Thanks Im going to work on that. I have very high CRP so my doc wants me on statins and I said no way. Sure wish there were docs that could help me.
Right on! My spouse has lost weight after I started controlling the food. She finally stopped eating cereal yay. She’s done well just doing low carb - not keto. Fat isn’t the boogeyman. Even with sad, fat is better since they add more sugar if they make it low fat. Fat blunts the glucose spike which blunts the insulin required by the pancreas. Learned that back when I was doing south beach which was alright. Now I’m 80-90% carnivore - high fat. Can’t deal with the oxylates. They give me brain fog and eye blurries. Wheat is high. I don’t eat seeds/nuts. Better. Feel better with high fat.
My understanding of the dangers of fats is that LDL has one marker for what it is that the Liver can recognize. When you mix high sugar (and/or brittle polyunsaturated fats) with high fat you can beak the marker so that the LDL becomes tiny and then stuck in the arteries. Your speach illustrates a natural experiment happening hundreds of thousands of times across the country. Everyone who differs from than their spouse and eat the same thing can benefit from your perspective.
I think the problem is that the liver cannot re-uptake oxidised LDL, so it continues running through the body for longer than it should. Possibly seed oils and/or glucose have an impact on that oxidation. However, you still require damage in the vascular tree for any possibility of LDL even being considered a possible problem. My understanding is that atherosclerotic plaques actually contain very little LDL anyway, like much less than 1% and I've even heard that 0.1% is around normal.
As a mom of a type 1 diabetic, I distinctly remember the endocrinologist telling us that our son should not be exercising (he was on cross country) when his blood sugar was above 200. While it may not be healthy to run for years, I wonder how much damage is happening due to even smaller elevations in blood sugar like his a1c of 5.1. That’s an average blood sugar of 101. I believe it’s known that tissue damage is occurring at even 95.
If he's been eating high carb, I don't care how skinny he is or in shape. I was an ultrarunner too, skinny and fit but had a CAC over 150 . Keto stopped the progression.
Siguiendo el modelo de energia lipidica, en cuanto se termine de usar la energia almacenada en forma de trigliceridos del cuerpo, el LDL deberia de bajar debido a que ya no habria produccion de VLDL por no existir trigliceridos en el cuerpo al seguir una dieta sin carbohidratos. O me equivoco?.
NEW DATA: Studies Comparing "Fat Burners" to "Carb Burners" told us that Carb Burners have more Efficiency. There was a BIG FLAW. It takes up to 90 days to get FULLY CONVERTED to Fat Metabolism. The earlier studies HAD NO TRANSITION TIME for the Fat Burners. After ALLOWING 90 DAYS to complete transition into full Fat Efficiency.... Fat Burners won in Energy Efficiency .... with the BONUS that they had far greater DURATION. Carb Burners HIT THE WALL & DIE when thier Carb Stores are Gone. When Fully Transitioned Fat Burners dont run out of fat.
My understanding is that LDL is necessary in every cell in the body, and that higher healthy LDL correlates favorably / positively with lower all cause mortality in people over 60. My understanding is that healthy LDL is essential and that damaged LDL may correlate with disease. My understanding is that LDL is damaged in humans primarily through two mechanisms: 1. exposure to high sugar / carbs, especially for prolonged periods, and 2. LDL exposure to high oxidation, as occurs with high Omega-6 levels (high O-6 to O-3 ratios) found in most or all seed oil fats. As I understand it.
I watch oodles of research reviews and lectures in this field, without ever really articulating any of it, but as far as my ear goes, that aligns with what I’ve seen.
I'd say Refined /Processed carbs ,more than high amounts of complex carbs .Ldl is also oxidised by smoking (probably vaping ,too), over-exercising , and
micro-plastics , amongst other things .
@@kenadams5504 Humans can manufacture all the glucose / carbs / sugar the body needs, there is ZERO need for dietary carbs, high amounts of complex carbs DISPLACE essential nutrients PROTEIN and ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS. Carbs (broadly) on a scale of 10 produce an insulin respones of 9.5, protein (broadly) is 4-4.5, fats is .5 to 1. Humanity largely has an epidemic of diseases of civilization (diabetes, heart disease, obesity, etc.) that result from hyperinsulinemia secondary to too much carbs too much of the time. Sarcopenia can be treated with high protein and resistance training. Seizure disorder and other neurodegenerative diseases can be treated with high fat / low carb diets. Complex carbs can cause weight gain / obesity / diabetes / hypertension / heart disease. Complex carbs are almost certainly superior to simple carbs in essentially the same way, but to a different degree, that they are superior to heroin and methamphetamine. My approach is Just Say No. Of course you can have all you want. Cheers. :)
Awesome presentation! You and your husband are an inspiration!❤
This is an excellent discussion and I wish more were open to being this vulnerable and accepting to "not fully knowing".
Glad I dropped in. Kept my attention all the way!
fantastic presentation! thank you for having it
This was really interesting. Correlation v causation. When I hear marathon running and cardio cause heart disease, I can't help but think that almost all of those people were/are high carb eaters, like your hubby. So is it the carbs, or the exercise? Do people who are fat adapted for their cardio have the same risk? Fascinating.
Very inspiring! I love how you took control and analyzed the data including how you felt.
Very nice and informative presentation. Many thanks! 👍
Great presentation!! ❤
Dr. Al Sears published an excellent book in 2010 explaining the problems of doing sustained cardio workouts (e.g. endurance running). The book is entitled "P.A.C.E. The 12-Minute Fitness Revolution." His idea involves doing short bursts of exertion, a complete departure from long cardio activity. I agree with his approach. In addition, his ideas about diet and insulin resistance were very much "on target" and many of the experts I follow today (e.g. Dr. Ben Bikman, Dr. Ken Berry, Dr. Jason Fung, etc.) are explaining diet and metabolism the same way Dr. Sears wrote about this in 2010. By the way, great talk, Susan!
Yes! I have his book, followed his workout and did well. I am so sorry it took me 11 years to get back to it.
Thank you! Fellow LMHR, carrying on much the same as you.
Loved this - thanks for sharing you and your husband's story
N=2
I love it.
Most people don’t make diet decisions on their own.
A large number of people choose their diet with the influence of their spouse.
Thank you for sharing.
Would've been nice if all the slides were shown full screen.
This is a topic I’ve worried about. Thank you!
A great presentation ❤❤
I'm a LMHR and we usually eat seperate meals. On holiday I will eat mostly meat while my wife is more plant-based. When we eat in restaurants we will often swap some of the meat and veg in dishes that satisfies both of us.
Thanks for posting this presentation. Been a fence since 2017.
A more important test is fasting insulin levels. A1c is not the focus
Is 7 a bad insulin number?
Ideally it should be under 5.
@@randyblanton5580
Thanks Im going to work on that. I have very high CRP so my doc wants me on statins and I said no way. Sure wish there were docs that could help me.
Right on! My spouse has lost weight after I started controlling the food. She finally stopped eating cereal yay. She’s done well just doing low carb - not keto. Fat isn’t the boogeyman. Even with sad, fat is better since they add more sugar if they make it low fat. Fat blunts the glucose spike which blunts the insulin required by the pancreas. Learned that back when I was doing south beach which was alright. Now I’m 80-90% carnivore - high fat. Can’t deal with the oxylates. They give me brain fog and eye blurries. Wheat is high. I don’t eat seeds/nuts. Better. Feel better with high fat.
My understanding of the dangers of fats is that LDL has one marker for what it is that the Liver can recognize. When you mix high sugar (and/or brittle polyunsaturated fats) with high fat you can beak the marker so that the LDL becomes tiny and then stuck in the arteries.
Your speach illustrates a natural experiment happening hundreds of thousands of times across the country. Everyone who differs from than their spouse and eat the same thing can benefit from your perspective.
I think the problem is that the liver cannot re-uptake oxidised LDL, so it continues running through the body for longer than it should. Possibly seed oils and/or glucose have an impact on that oxidation. However, you still require damage in the vascular tree for any possibility of LDL even being considered a possible problem. My understanding is that atherosclerotic plaques actually contain very little LDL anyway, like much less than 1% and I've even heard that 0.1% is around normal.
@@trail.blazer ruclips.net/video/DXKJaQeteE0/видео.html
RFKJr should be in charge of which studies are government funded, not big pharma and these issues would rise to the top!
As a mom of a type 1 diabetic, I distinctly remember the endocrinologist telling us that our son should not be exercising (he was on cross country) when his blood sugar was above 200. While it may not be healthy to run for years, I wonder how much damage is happening due to even smaller elevations in blood sugar like his a1c of 5.1. That’s an average blood sugar of 101. I believe it’s known that tissue damage is occurring at even 95.
If he's been eating high carb, I don't care how skinny he is or in shape. I was an ultrarunner too, skinny and fit but had a CAC over 150 . Keto stopped the progression.
What do you think about Normotim for dieting? Has anyone tried this supplement?
Siguiendo el modelo de energia lipidica, en cuanto se termine de usar la energia almacenada en forma de trigliceridos del cuerpo, el LDL deberia de bajar debido a que ya no habria produccion de VLDL por no existir trigliceridos en el cuerpo al seguir una dieta sin carbohidratos. O me equivoco?.
What is TC means?
Total cholesterol
NEW DATA: Studies Comparing "Fat Burners" to "Carb Burners" told us that Carb Burners have more Efficiency. There was a BIG FLAW. It takes up to 90 days to get FULLY CONVERTED to Fat Metabolism. The earlier studies HAD NO TRANSITION TIME for the Fat Burners.
After ALLOWING 90 DAYS to complete transition into full Fat Efficiency.... Fat Burners won in Energy Efficiency .... with the BONUS that they had far greater DURATION. Carb Burners HIT THE WALL & DIE when thier Carb Stores are Gone. When Fully Transitioned Fat Burners dont run out of fat.